Case 1602378/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Stokes v Lewis Homes (South Wales) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602378/2020
- Decision date
- 28 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Stokes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant’s complaints of direct disability discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 and discrimination arising from disability under s15 Equality Act 2010. It held that both complaints had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claims, for unfair dismissal and breach of s10 Employment Relations Act 1999, were not determined at this stage and remained listed for hearing on 16 and 17 September 2021. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s usual practice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of direct disability discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability under s15 Equality Act 2010; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.