Case 1602380/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Gwion Rhys Borland v Seiont Manor Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602380/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gwion Rhys Borland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment in the absence of an ET3 response form from Seiont Manor Limited. Employment Judge Brace recorded that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination and acted under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013.
The claims upheld were for unpaid wages and notice pay. The tribunal awarded Gwion Rhys Borland £985.25 gross for unpaid wages and £600.92 net for notice pay, producing a total award of £1,586.17.
The judgment stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No lay panel members or discrimination claims were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment records the claim as Unpaid Wages (gross). | Upheld | — | £985 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment records the claim as Notice Pay (net); no further factual reasoning is given. | Upheld | — | £601 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,586
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.