Case 1602382/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Snuggs v Public Health Wales NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1602382/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Snuggs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the complaint of unfair dismissal in this judgment. By letter dated 05 March 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because the claim had not been actively pursued and because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 04 March 2024.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 14 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because it had not been actively pursued and because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 04 March 2024. The claimant did not make representations in writing or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 05 March 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.