Case 1602404/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Watkins v Bob Martin UK Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602404/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Watkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Bob Martin UK Limited (in administration) failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment was entered under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
As a result, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr P Watkins a protective award of £11,655.01 pursuant to section 189 of the 1992 Act. No other remedy components were set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award ordered under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 after the tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188. | Upheld | — | £11,655 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,655
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.