Case 1602411/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Alexander v EE Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602411/2020
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Alexander
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied document is a Certificate of Correction issued under rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It states that the judgment sent to the parties on 28 January 2021 in Mrs C Alexander v EE Limited, case 1602411/2020, was corrected as set out in the certificate, with Employment Judge Brace signing the correction on 24 February 2021 and the corrected document sent to the parties on 3 March 2021.
The extracted text does not include the underlying reasons, the tribunal's findings on the substantive claims, or any remedy figures. On the basis of this document alone, no reliable extraction can be made of the claim-by-claim outcomes, the legal tests applied, or the monetary award, if any, recorded in the original judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied text is only a Certificate of Correction under Rule 69. It does not set out any substantive claim, finding, or outcome from the underlying judgment, so no claim-specific extraction is reliable from this text alone. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.