Case 1602418/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Thompson v Severn View Social Club and Institute — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602418/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the case was heard at Cardiff by CVP on 9 April 2021 before Employment Judge R Evans. It records that the claimant was an employee for the purposes of section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided unless requested.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim under section 135(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £854.22. It also upheld the unfair dismissal complaint and awarded £250.00 as a compensatory award for loss of statutory rights, recording that there was no basic award in lieu of the redundancy payment.
The wrongful dismissal complaint also succeeded, with £854.22 awarded as compensation, payable net after deductions for tax and national insurance. In addition, the tribunal ordered £287.74, being two weeks' pay, under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The total monetary outcome recorded in the judgment was £2,246.18.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim under section 135(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and ordered payment of £854.22. | Upheld | — | £854 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal complaint and ordered £250.00 as a compensatory award for loss of statutory rights. It recorded that there was no basic award in lieu of the statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal complaint was well founded and succeeded. The tribunal ordered £854.22 as compensation for wrongful dismissal, payable net after deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £854 |
| Other | Pursuant to section 38 Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered additional compensation of two weeks' pay totalling £287.74 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,246
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.135(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.