Case 1602473/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Clarkson v POBL Group Ltd By: VHS — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602473/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Clarkson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Craft on 22 June 2022. The tribunal decided that Miss R Clarkson was not disabled at the relevant time. On that basis, her disability discrimination claim against POBL Group Ltd was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claim of unfair constructive dismissal was not determined at this hearing and would proceed to the already listed full hearing on 19 to 23 September 2022. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At the preliminary hearing on 22 June 2022, the tribunal held that the claimant was not disabled at the relevant time and dismissed the disability discrimination claim. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining unfair constructive dismissal claim would proceed to a full hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.