Case 1602481/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Evans v Fineline Printing & Stationery Limited Heard: by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602481/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Evans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss C Evans was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy because Fineline Printing & Stationery Limited failed to apply a reasonable consultation process. It also found that, had a reasonable process been operated, the dismissal would have followed fairly a short time later. The unfair dismissal compensatory award was £1,076.58, made up of two weeks' net pay of £288.29 per week and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal further awarded a redundancy payment of £2,833.99 and £700.14 for accrued but untaken holiday. It ordered £666.48 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to give Miss Evans a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment stated that the total ordered was £5,277.19, and that the claimant accepted an overpayment of £439.31, leaving £4,837.88 to be paid.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Found unfair by reason of redundancy because the respondent failed to apply a reasonable consultation process; the tribunal said the dismissal would have ensued fairly a short time later had such a process been operated. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded in the sum ordered by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £2,834 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum awarded for accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Other | Award made pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent failed to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,277
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,077
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.