Case 1602490/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jones v Limitless Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602490/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 2 December 2020, and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim, or part of it, on the papers.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,538 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £233.03 for that breach. The tribunal recorded a total sum due of £3,771.03.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,538 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,538 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £233.03. | Upheld | — | £233 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,771
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.