Case 1602492/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Arnold v 39 Desserts — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602492/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Arnold brought claims against 39 Desserts for unfair dismissal and arrears of pay. The unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out in a separate judgment and reasons dated 18 March 2021, on the basis that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it, the claimant had less than two years' service, and he had not made written representations when directed.
The remaining claim concerned alleged unpaid wages during the COVID-19 furlough period. The claimant said he was owed £2,157.60, described as three payments of £719.20, and he said he had received no communication that he was being removed from furlough. The respondent said he had ceased employment on 6 July 2020, had refused to return to work, and had not provided evidence of vulnerability.
At the final hearing on 14 May 2021 the claimant did not attend and no evidence or supporting documents had been filed on his behalf. The tribunal made enquiries by telephone to Miss Bunce and found, on balance, that the hearing emails and joining instructions had been sent to the correct email address and received. Applying Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 rule 47 and the overriding objective, the tribunal refused to postpone the hearing and dismissed the remaining claim. No award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by Employment Judge Brace in a separate judgment and reasons dated 18 March 2021 because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim, the claimant had less than two years' service, and he had failed to make written representations as directed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay / unpaid furlough wages, said to total £2,157.60. Dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the final hearing and filed no evidence; the tribunal made no merits finding on entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 rule 47
- Overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.