Case 1602506/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Legge v R1 AL Realisations Limited (in Administration) R2 The Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy CONSENT — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602506/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in which the tribunal recorded that Mr G Legge was employed by AL Realisations Limited (in Administration). The judgment notes the appointments of joint and additional administrators, and records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 2 September 2020. The parties agreed, for the purposes of the consent judgment, that the protected period began on that termination date.
The claimant brought a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 seeking a protective award for failure to consult. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was assigned to an establishment where 20 or more redundancies were proposed within 90 days, and that the respondent did not fully inform and consult with the claimant in accordance with sections 188 and 188A of the Act.
The tribunal made a protective award in the claimant's favour for a protected period of 35 days, capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service and subject to any deductions required by law. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply, but that any recoupment notice does not apply to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. No order was made for costs or fees, with each party bearing its own costs and fees.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under s.189 TULR(C)A 1992 for a protective award arising from failure to inform and consult under ss.188 and 188A. The tribunal made a protective award in the claimant's favour for a protected period of 35 days, capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service and subject to deductions required by law; no separate monetary figure was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.189 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188A TULR(C)A 1992
- Recoupment Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.