Case 1602507/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N. Lukaris (C1) Mr. L. Williams (C2) Mr. I. Fitzgerald (C3) Mr J. Hearne (C4) Mr C. Jenkins (C5) Mr. S. Holcombe (C6) Ms B. Davies (C7) Mr. K. Poole (C8) v Urban CSR Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602507/2020
- Decision date
- 15 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N. Lukaris (C1) Mr. L. Williams (C2) Mr. I. Fitzgerald (C3) Mr J. Hearne (C4) Mr C. Jenkins (C5) Mr. S. Holcombe (C6) Ms B. Davies (C7) Mr. K. Poole (C8)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21. It found that Urban CSR Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimants' wages, had breached the claimants' contracts in relation to notice of termination, had failed to pay holiday pay, and that the claimants were entitled to redundancy payments. The notice-pay finding did not apply to C3 and C6, and the holiday-pay finding did not apply to C6. The judgment states that the sums awarded are gross and subject to the usual statutory deductions.
The judgment then sets out the individual gross sums due to each claimant for wages, notice pay where claimed, and holiday pay where claimed. The listed monetary awards total £86,570.74. On redundancy, the tribunal made a declaration of entitlement but recorded that the claim did not apply for an award, so no redundancy payment figure is included in the monetary totals.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The finding concerned notice of termination; C3 and C6 made no such claim. | Upheld | — | £4,596 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday pay due; C6 made no such claim. | Upheld | — | £11,667 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared that the claimants were entitled to redundancy payments, but the judgment states that the claim did not apply for an award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and listed gross sums for each claimant, subject to the usual statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £70,307 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £86,571
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.