Case 1602510/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Richardson v Trevor Arms Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602510/2024
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Richardson presented a wages claim against Trevor Arms Ltd. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Trevor Arms Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss Richardson £1,664.43 gross, with the claimant responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due. The listed hearing on 16 September 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined the claim under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,664.43 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,664 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,664
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.