Case 1602529/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Winter First v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board Second Respondent: Acacia Management Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602529/2023
- Decision date
- 24 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Winter First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied to amend her claim to add discrimination and whistleblowing complaints, and later retracted an application for "other payments". The tribunal refused the discrimination and whistleblowing amendments. It held that the written application did not clearly identify what was being alleged or when, that the proposed complaints were new claims rather than minor amendments, and that the balance of injustice and hardship favoured refusal because the matters were out of time and would prejudice the respondents.
On unfair dismissal, the claimant accepted she had never been employed by the First Respondent, withdrew that part of the claim, and it was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal then considered the claim against the Second Respondent and found that the claimant was on notice of dismissal when she received her P45 on 5 August 2023.
The tribunal held that, even taking ACAS early conciliation into account, the claim was presented about two months late once the ET1 was treated as accepted on 27 February 2024 after the address issue was corrected. It rejected the claimant's explanation that ACAS or the tribunal had drafted or submitted the ET1, found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, and struck out the unfair dismissal claim for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | As against the First Respondent, the claimant accepted she had never been employed by it, withdrew the unfair dismissal complaint, and it was dismissed on withdrawal. As against the Second Respondent, the tribunal found the claim was out of time and struck it out for lack of jurisdiction; the judgment contains an inconsistent date reference in the dismissal paperwork, but the finding was that the claimant was on notice of dismissal when she received her P45 on 5 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Selkent Bus Company v Moore
- Cocking v Sandhurst (Stationers) Ltd
- Vaughan v Modality Partnerships
- Chandhok v Tirkey
- Chief Constable of Essex Police v Kovacevic
- reasonably practicable time limit test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.