Case 1602533/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Belshaw v Alyn Bowen Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602533/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Belshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 15 October 2024, the Respondent accepted that the Claimant was owed 5.5 days' holiday pay in the gross sum of £1,100 and one week's wages in the gross sum of £1,000. The tribunal also noted that the payslip for the week ending 24 May 2024 remained unpaid, and that payment would be processed on 17 October 2024 and likely received shortly after. The Claimant confirmed that he did not wish to pursue the notice pay claim.
The tribunal found that the additional claim for 3.5 days unpaid wages was unfounded. It nevertheless ordered the Respondent to pay £1,000 for unlawful deduction from wages and £1,100 for failed holiday entitlement. The judgment also records that the Claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondent accepted that one week's wages in the gross sum of £1,000 remained unpaid. The tribunal also recorded that the additional claim for 3.5 days unpaid wages was unfounded. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Holiday pay | The Respondent accepted that the Claimant was owed 5.5 days in holiday pay in the gross sum of £1,100, and the tribunal ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
| Breach of contract | The Claimant confirmed that he did not wish to pursue the notice pay claim, and the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.