Case 1602610/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. L. Memihr v Mamaris Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602610/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. L. Memihr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a liability judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr. L. Memihr against Mamaris Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, failed to pay holiday pay due to him, and breached his contract in relation to notice of termination.
The judgment did not assess quantum. It stated that the sum to be awarded would be determined on submission of written evidence by the claimant, with a further remedy judgment to be issued in due course. It also noted that a hearing might not be required, but if one were needed a notice would be issued.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Liability judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Liability judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due to the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Liability judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract concerning notice of termination. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.