Case 1602689/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nida v Chloe Eugenie — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602689/2023
- Decision date
- 13 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nida
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 10 February 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to confirm the basis of the claim because he had less than the required two years' continuous service.
The claimant did not provide the requested confirmation. On that basis, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 8 April 2024, and those claims were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By letter dated 10 February 2024, the claimant was invited to confirm the basis of his unfair dismissal claim because he had less than the required two years' continuous service. He did not provide that confirmation, and the tribunal struck out the complaint on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.