Case 1602811/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss S Pooley v Wrexham County Borough Council HELD AT/BY: Mold by CVP — 2024

Case reference: 1602811/2023
Decision date: 2 July 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Panel members: Ms M Humphries, Mr M Vine

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss S Pooley

Respondent

Wrexham County Borough Council HELD AT/BY: Mold by CVP

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal sat at Mold by CVP on 1 July 2024 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, with Ms M Humphries and Mr M Vine as the lay members. The claimant, Miss S Pooley, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.

The unanimous judgment recorded that the claimant’s direct disability discrimination claim was dismissed because it had been withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on that claim beyond recording the withdrawal and the resulting dismissal.

The judgment also states that it does not affect the claimant’s continuing claims of constructive unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was noted in the record.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The tribunal dismissed the direct disability discrimination claim upon it having been withdrawn by the claimant.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.