Case 1602886/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Duggan v Pure Rock Asphelte Co Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602886/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs J Kiely, Mrs M Humphries
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs R Duggan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was at all material times employed by the second respondent, Breaksea Residential Homes Ltd, and the first respondent, Pure Rock Asphelte Co Ltd, was dismissed from the proceedings. The claimant's complaints of breach of contract in relation to notice pay, detriment for making a protected disclosure, and unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure were each found not to be well-founded and were dismissed.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £25.00. The judgment was given orally at the hearing on 8 November 2024 and sent to the parties on 13 November 2024.
The race discrimination claim noted in the gov.uk listing categories is not adjudicated within the text of this judgment document; written reasons were not provided and the available text does not contain any determination on a race discrimination complaint.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay; not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure; not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure (automatic unfair dismissal under whistleblowing provisions); not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded; respondent ordered to pay £25.00. | Upheld | — | £25 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.