Case 1602888/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Davies v Bau Fox Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602888/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after Bau Fox Ltd failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers. The only claim recorded in the judgment was for unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered Bau Fox Ltd to pay Mr H Davies £784 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due.
The listed hearing on 28 February 2024 was cancelled following the paper determination. No other claims, remedies, or findings are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £784 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £784
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.