Case 1602903/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Radford (a child) by Ms H Radford as litigation friend v Waffle King Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602903/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Radford (a child) by Ms H Radford as litigation friend
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 20 November 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Waffle King Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £300 gross to the claimant, with the claimant responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due.
The hearing listed for 28 May 2024 was cancelled. No other claims, remedies, or legal tests were set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; the tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £300 gross. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.