Case 1602946/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Moodie v RGM Security Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602946/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Moodie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Brace on 5 June 2024. The Claimant, Mrs S Moodie, was represented by herself and the Respondent, RGM Security Ltd, was represented by Mr D Jones, solicitor. The tribunal recorded that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the Claimant was not entitled to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. It stated that, even if she were able to demonstrate that she was an employee, which the tribunal expressly said had not been determined, she would have been employed by the Respondent for less than two years. The complaint of unfair dismissal was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal held that the Claimant was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint because, even if she could establish employee status, she would have been employed for less than two years. Employee status was not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.