Case 1602959/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Eastman v Tute Education Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602959/2023
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Eastman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case by video at Cardiff Employment Tribunal on 28 February 2024 before Employment Judge R Harfield, with the Claimant representing himself and the Respondent represented by Ms Veimou (Litigation Consultant). The Tribunal found that the complaint of breach of contract was well-founded, in that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant incentive payments of £500 and £3,500.
The Claimant was awarded the gross sum of £4,000. Written reasons were not provided in this judgment; reasons were given orally at the hearing and will only be reduced to writing if requested within 14 days. No separate determination on any unlawful deduction from wages claim is recorded in the text of this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the Respondent in breach of contract for not paying incentive payments of £500 and £3,500. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.