Case 1602961/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Ramzan v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board — 2026
- Case reference
- 1602961/2025
- Decision date
- 15 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Appearances
- Venue
- Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Ramzan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 15 May 2026, Employment Judge E Macdonald found that Miss N Ramzan was not disabled at the material times. Summary reasons for that finding were given orally and are not set out in the written record.
By consent, the Tribunal struck out the complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising under s 15 Equality Act 2010, and failures to make reasonable adjustments. Each was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal also struck out by consent, on the same basis, three alleged protected disclosure detriments identified as Issues 5.1, 5.1.3 and 5.1.4 of the draft List of Issues. The judgment records no monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination complaint, struck out by consent as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising complaint under s 15 Equality Act 2010, struck out by consent as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failures to make reasonable adjustments, struck out by consent as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Three alleged protected disclosure detriments identified as Issues 5.1, 5.1.3 and 5.1.4 of the draft List of Issues, struck out by consent as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- s 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.