Case 1602966/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Glover v Thermax Construction Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1602966/2025
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Glover
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 15 July 2025. The respondent, Thermax Construction Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were assessed at £3,446.64, less £408.55 received from benefits during the notice period, leaving a net sum of £3,038.09 payable by the respondent. The claimant was held responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. Gross damages of £3,446.64 less £408.55 received from benefits in the notice period, leaving £3,038.09 payable. Determined under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £3,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,038
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.