Case 1602986/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Phillips v Creative Republic of Cardiff Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602986/2023
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant’s holiday pay claim and his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, finding both were not well-founded. No separate monetary award was made on those claims.
By consent, the claimant’s claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements was found well-founded, but only in relation to pay statements due in the 13 weeks before the claim was presented. The Respondent was ordered to pay £300 compensation.
The Tribunal noted that no uplift was applied for the alleged failure to deal with a grievance because Schedule A2 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 does not list this claim as one for which such an uplift is available.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim was found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim was found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | By consent, the claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements was well-founded in respect of pay statements due in the 13 weeks before the claim was presented. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.