Case 1603108/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Ms J Eveson (See Schedule) v Brawd Pizza Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025

Case reference: 1603108/2023
Decision date: 13 January 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Brace Judgment

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms J Eveson (See Schedule)

Respondent

Brawd Pizza Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal held that the claimants listed in the Schedule were all assigned to one establishment. It found that the protective award claims under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well-founded because the Respondent failed to comply with its statutory collective consultation obligations before proposed redundancy dismissals took effect.

Under section 189(1)(d) and section 189(2), (3) and (4) of the 1992 Act, the Tribunal made protective awards in respect of the claimants listed in the Schedule. It ordered the Respondent to pay remuneration to each claimant for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 24 November 2023.

The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply to the awards. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award claim under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The Tribunal held the claims were well-founded because the Respondent failed to comply with its statutory collective consultation obligations before proposed redundancy dismissals took effect.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

6 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.