Case 1603145/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rebecca Taylor v Conwy Brewery Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1603145/2023
- Decision date
- 20 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Llandudno
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rebecca Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting at Llandudno on 25 April 2024 before Employment Judge R F Powell, found that the claimant Miss Rebecca Taylor was unfairly dismissed by Conwy Brewery Limited. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation to the claimant.
The compensation comprised £500 for loss of statutory rights, a basic award of £1,050, £10,353.22 for loss of earnings to the date of the hearing, and £3,960 for future loss of earnings. By consent, a 25% uplift on the compensatory award of £3,703.30 was added by reason of the respondent's failure to comply with the ACAS Code on Discipline and Grievance procedures.
Reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing; written reasons are not provided unless requested. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 do not apply in this case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Compensation comprises £500 loss of statutory rights, £1,050 basic award, £10,353.22 past loss of earnings, £3,960 future loss of earnings, and a £3,703.30 25% ACAS uplift on the compensatory award (by consent). The judgment does not state an explicit single total figure; the sum here is the arithmetic total of the listed components. | Upheld | — | £19,567 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,567
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,050
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £18,517
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code on Discipline and Grievance
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.