Case 1603212/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent: Mr R Leeding Proserve Logistics Ltd JUDGMENT The claim of dismissal or detriment due to the making of a protected disclosure having been withdrawn by the Claimant is dismissed. The claim of unfair dismissal is struck out as the claimant’s does not have sufficient continuity of service. The remaining claims of direct age discrimination, direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability continues to a final hearing. Approved by Employment Judge S Moore Dated: 11 November 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 04 December 2025 Katie Dickson FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS v Mr R Leeding Proserve Logistics Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1603212/2025
- Decision date
- 11 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Dated
Parties
2 namedRespondent: Mr R Leeding Proserve Logistics Ltd JUDGMENT The claim of dismissal or detriment due to the making of a protected disclosure having been withdrawn by the Claimant is dismissed. The claim of unfair dismissal is struck out as the claimant’s does not have sufficient continuity of service. The remaining claims of direct age discrimination, direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability continues to a final hearing. Approved by Employment Judge S Moore Dated: 11 November 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 04 December 2025 Katie Dickson FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claims brought
3 categoriesOutcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.