Case 1603238/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Nadia James Roper v Rhondda Brown Trout Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1603238/2025
- Decision date
- 30 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nadia James Roper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNadia James Roper presented the claim in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 7 August 2025. Rhondda Brown Trout Ltd failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Rhondda Brown Trout Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Roper’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay her £937.50 gross, which was also the total award. Ms Roper was responsible for any income tax or statutory deductions due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £938 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £938
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.