Case 1603396/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Owen v Mrs S Hughes t/a Studio 25 — 2026
- Case reference
- 1603396/2025
- Decision date
- 20 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's pregnancy discrimination claim, finding that it was not well founded. It also dismissed the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages on the same basis.
The Tribunal found that the claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars was well-founded. However, that claim was dismissed because the claimant had not succeeded in a claim under Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the pregnancy discrimination claim was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and states that it was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars was well-founded but dismissed because the claimant had failed to succeed in a claim under Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.