Case 1603663/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Georgatos v Goody 4 Paws Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1603663/2025
- Decision date
- 20 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Georgatos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Georgatos's complaint of unfair dismissal against Goody 4 Paws Limited was struck out. The Tribunal recorded that she had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
Applying section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which requires not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, the Tribunal found that the claimant was not entitled to bring that complaint. It also found that, despite being given an opportunity to do so, she had not provided an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment expressly stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's other complaints were expressly not affected by this judgment and were not adjudicated in it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.