Case 1603690/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr G Fraser-Natale and Thrift Vintage Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1603690/2024
- Decision date
- 8 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff by CVP before Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondents did not attend. The judgment records that the claim concerned unpaid holiday pay.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim against the First Respondent because the First Respondent was not the employer. It also dismissed the unpaid holiday pay claim against the Second Respondent because the claim was presented outside the primary limitation period and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within that period. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed. The claim against the First Respondent was dismissed because the First Respondent was not the employer. The claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed because it was presented outside the primary limitation period and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within that period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- primary limitation period
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.