Case 1603924/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P E Bowen v Superdrug Stores plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 1603924/2025
- Decision date
- 11 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brady
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P E Bowen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 11 February 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim. The warning was given because it appeared, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not complied with paragraph 10 of a case management order dated 6 January 2026.
The claimant did not reply to the warning or request a hearing. The Tribunal was satisfied that the grounds for strike out under Rule 38 applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3, because the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies the claim as Disability Discrimination. The judgment itself is a short strike-out judgment and does not describe the underlying allegations. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.