Case 1604010/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Doyle v Northeast Producers Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1604010/2025
- Decision date
- 3 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- On video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Moore, sitting alone by video on 3 February 2026, considered two complaints brought by Mr J Doyle against Northeast Producers Ltd. The judge found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded, the respondent having made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 11 to 26 June 2025. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £115.99, being the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The judge also found that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded, the respondent having failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a further £54.28, again with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so no further analysis or legal tests are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 11-26 June 2025; respondent ordered to pay £115.99 gross. | Upheld | — | £116 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £54 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £170
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.