Case 1604084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Waters v Governing Body of Dylan Thomas Community School and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1604084/2024
- Decision date
- 2 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs H Waters
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mrs H Waters' claim in a judgment dated 2 June 2025. The reason given was that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 22 October 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 15 May 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 13 to 17 October 2025 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 October 2024 and did not actively pursue the claim. By letter dated 15 May 2025, the Tribunal invited representations or a hearing request before strike out, but none were made or they were insufficient. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.