Case 1604112/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MRS PAINTER (CLAIMANT’S WIFE) FOR THE v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 1604112/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mr A Fryer
Parties
1 namedClaimant
MRS PAINTER (CLAIMANT’S WIFE) FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal, sitting at Swansea before Employment Judge S Povey with Mrs J Beard and Mr A Fryer, held that the discrimination complaints were presented in time and that it had jurisdiction to determine them. The written record does not set out the factual reasoning because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The complaint of discrimination arising from disability was dismissed because it was not made out. The complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was also dismissed because it was not made out. No monetary award was recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability; the Tribunal held it was not made out. The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments; the Tribunal held it was not made out. The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.