Case 1604166/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Stanislaw Stypka v JK Same Day Delivery Limited — 2025

Case reference: 1604166/2024
Decision date: 10 July 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Stanislaw Stypka

Respondent

JK Same Day Delivery Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the claim brought by Mr Stanislaw Stypka against JK Same Day Delivery Limited was struck out pursuant to r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It does not contain written reasons, separate findings on the listed claims, or any remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The short written judgment states that the claim is struck out under r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not provide written reasons or separate findings on this claim.	Struck out	—	—
Disability discrimination	The short written judgment states that the claim is struck out under r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not provide written reasons or separate findings on this claim.	Struck out	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The short written judgment states that the claim is struck out under r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not provide written reasons or separate findings on this claim.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The short written judgment states that the claim is struck out under r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not provide written reasons or separate findings on this claim.	Struck out	—	—
Other	The short written judgment states that the claim is struck out under r 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The listing categories include Time Limits and Written Pay Statement, but the written judgment does not set out separate reasons or findings.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.