Case 1604166/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Tucker v Airsoft Cymru The Depot Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1604166/2025
- Decision date
- 19 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Newport
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Tucker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed Mr Tucker’s claim of detriment due to the making of a protected disclosure because it was not well founded. It upheld his claim for unpaid wages and annual leave, which it treated as a wages claim, and ordered Airsoft Cymru The Depot Ltd to pay £18,577.17 gross.
The Tribunal also upheld Mr Tucker’s wrongful dismissal claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,666.92 gross. The combined awards were £20,244.09 gross, with Mr Tucker responsible for any tax or statutory deductions due. Full reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claim of detriment due to the making of a protected disclosure was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment treated the claim for unpaid wages and annual leave as a wages claim and awarded this amount gross. | Upheld | — | £18,577 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The award was ordered gross. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,244
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.