Case 1604171/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Wilson v Flintshire Transport Services — 2025
- Case reference
- 1604171/2024
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Wilson presented the claim on 21 September 2024. Flintshire Transport Services did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge S Jenkins determined the matter under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The tribunal therefore proceeded to make a determination on the papers before it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered it to pay £625 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £6,630 in damages. The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered a further £625 gross.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance contributions. The total sum payable by the respondent was £7,880.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £625 gross. | Upheld | — | £625 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £6,630 in damages. | Upheld | — | £6,630 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £625 gross. | Upheld | — | £625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.