Case 1604189/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Hagos v Cardiff City Transport Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1604189/2025
- Decision date
- 21 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Hagos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cardiff on 21 August 2026, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Mr Y Hagos's complaints against Cardiff City Transport Services Limited of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, refusal of the right to be accompanied by a trade union official, and race discrimination. All four complaints were dismissed on that basis.
Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out why jurisdiction was lacking or make findings on the underlying allegations. It records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint of refusal of the right to be accompanied by a trade union official. The judgment does not identify its statutory basis. Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.