Case 1604190/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Michael T Jones v Wrexham County Borough Council Street Team — 2026
- Case reference
- 1604190/2025
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Povey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michael T Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Povey struck out Michael T Jones's claim against Wrexham County Borough Council Street Team on 24 July 2026. The claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 24 June and 2 July 2026 and had not actively pursued the claim.
The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 15 July 2026, warning that it was considering striking out the claim and offering an opportunity to explain why it should continue or to request a hearing. The claimant did not reply. The judge found that the grounds for striking out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that striking out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The hearing scheduled for 27 August 2026 was cancelled. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type or any protected characteristic. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.