Case 1604303/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Jones v Matthew Hardy Peet T/A Peet and Sons — 2025
- Case reference
- 1604303/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Swansea CJC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction in the period from 23 July 2024 to 30 August 2024. It ordered payment of £91.52 gross. The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract claim for notice pay and awarded £2,196.48, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal further upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken when the employment ended. It awarded £541.56 as the net value due. Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,759.04.
The unfair dismissal complaint succeeded, and the tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. However, it also found there was a 100% chance that she would have been fairly dismissed in any event. The judgment records that no award for loss of statutory rights was included because that head would fall within the compensatory award and was therefore subject to the 100% reduction; the judge noted that an oral indication at the hearing that £500 would be awarded for loss of statutory rights had been an error.
The tribunal also found that, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Finding no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable, it held that it was just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002, in the sum of £736.16.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay award. | Upheld | — | £2,196 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated the holiday pay complaint was well-founded and described the non-payment as a breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £542 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,759 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair but also found there was a 100% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event, so no unfair dismissal compensation was included. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Award for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £736 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,325
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.