Case 1800001/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Congregation of Jesus Charitable Trustee and Julia MacDonald — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800001/2020
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in case 1800001/2020 between Mrs C Reeves and Congregation of Jesus Charitable Trustee and Julia MacDonald. It records no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints.
Employment Judge Deeley recorded on 10 June 2020 that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The decision is a Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not record any remedy, award, or separate findings on each complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The short judgment does not identify the individual complaints; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The short judgment does not identify the individual complaints; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.