Case 1800004/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bannon v VLT Logistics (formerly Vernon Land Transport Ltd) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800004/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bannon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Bannon brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against VLT Logistics (formerly Vernon Land Transport Ltd). The case was heard at Leeds on 2 and 3 July 2019 before Employment Judge Keevash, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment states only that the complaint of unfair dismissal fails. No substantive written reasons are included in the extracted record because the tribunal recorded that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested within 14 days.
The judgment also lists post-decision case management directions for a costs hearing on 10 September 2019, including directions for the respondent to send an updated schedule of costs and for each party to exchange financial information. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the complaint of unfair dismissal fails. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.