Case 1800012/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Benjamin Thomas v Safe Haven Adolescent Care Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1800012/2025
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Benjamin Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Claimant withdrew his complaints in respect of holiday pay, unauthorised deductions from wages and/or breach of contract concerning on call payments, and direct discrimination on the grounds of marriage and civil partnership. Those complaints were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment states that the Claimant's remaining claims against the Respondent continue in accordance with case management orders made on 22 May 2025. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint in respect of holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages, and/or breach of contract concerning on call payments, was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The complaint in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages, and/or breach of contract concerning on call payments, was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The complaint in respect of direct discrimination on the grounds of marriage and civil partnership was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.