Case 1800017/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Elliott v East Coast Kitchen Yorkshire Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800017/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Elliott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that East Coast Kitchen Yorkshire Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Elliott's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £1,179.55.
The tribunal also found that Mr Elliott had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,280 for that breach.
The hearing listed for 5 May 2020 was cancelled. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Deeley on 28 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,179.55. | Upheld | — | £1,180 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,280. | Upheld | — | £1,280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,460
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.