Case 1800045/2020 · Employment Tribunal

In person v Mrs Milner, registered manager and co-owner — 2020

Case reference: 1800045/2020
Decision date: 7 May 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cox Representation
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

In person

Respondent

Mrs Milner, registered manager and co-owner

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The hearing took place at Leeds on 7 May 2020 before Employment Judge Cox. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mrs Milner, registered manager and co-owner of Staff Call UK Limited.

The judgment records that the claims for breach of Regulation 7 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, breach of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998, and indirect race discrimination in relation to the allocation of shifts were all dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the extracted text beyond the fact of withdrawal.

No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment extract.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	Claim described as breach of Regulation 7 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Claim described as breach of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Race discrimination	Claim described as indirect race discrimination in relation to the allocation of shifts; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	Race	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.