Case 1800047/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ali v New Day Cards Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800047/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 7 January 2021, sent to the parties on 11 January 2021, the Tribunal required the claimant to pay a £20 deposit for each complaint identified in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.9 of the Case Management Summary as a condition of continuing those claims. The order stated that any such claim would be struck out if the deposit was not received by 28 January 2021.
The Tribunal recorded that no deposits had been paid. It therefore struck out the claims identified in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.9 under rule 37. The extracted text does not identify the individual substantive nature of those struck-out complaints.
The judgment also recorded that the remaining claims would proceed to the final hearing. Those were victimisation claims in respect of the complaints identified in paragraphs 5.11, 5.13 and 5.15, and the claims of direct age and sex discrimination and victimisation identified in paragraph 5.14 of the Case Management Summary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claims identified in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.9 of the Case Management Summary were struck out after the claimant did not pay the ordered £20 deposit for each complaint by 28 January 2021. The extracted text does not specify the substantive type of each of those claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.