Case 1800052/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Khan v Rams & Co Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800052/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Khan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Khan was employed by Rams & Co Ltd as a cashier from 18 December 1999 until his dismissal on 30 September 2023. He originally advanced an automatically unfair dismissal claim based on protected disclosure, but withdrew that claim and proceeded with an unfair dismissal claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the reason for dismissal was not made out, noting that no evidence was called on the respondent's behalf. It therefore found that the dismissal was unfair. It also found that the claimant did not contribute to his dismissal.
On remedy, Mr Khan elected reinstatement, but that was not possible because the respondent was in creditors voluntary liquidation. The tribunal applied the Recoupment Regulations and awarded a basic award of £10,003.20, calculated from gross weekly pay of £333.44 multiplied by 20 years and 1.5, and a compensatory award of £11,398.77 based on net weekly pay of £302.24 and 37 weeks and 5 days of immediate loss. It did not award future loss, finding that the claimant had not applied for jobs in the six months after dismissal and had also received six months' notice, and it added £500 for loss of statutory employment rights. The grand total was £21,901.97, with a prescribed element of £11,898.77 covering 30 September 2023 to 19 June 2024 and excess over that prescribed element of £10,003.20.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant originally pursued an automatically unfair dismissal claim based on protected disclosure, but that claim was withdrawn. The tribunal determined the remaining unfair dismissal claim under section 98 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £21,902 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,902
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,003
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,399
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.